Sources
References are shown with the story. Primary research, official guidance, standards, and reputable evidence syntheses are preferred for material health claims.
How The Daily chooses sources, distinguishes estimates from facts, labels visuals, reviews material, and handles corrections.
Read The DailyThe Daily turns health, movement, nutrition, recovery, behavior, and product questions into practical reading. It aims to be evidence-informed, understandable, appropriately cautious, and honest about uncertainty.
An article is educational content, not individualized medical advice. A reference list and review date support transparency but do not make a story a clinical assessment.
References are shown with the story. Primary research, official guidance, standards, and reputable evidence syntheses are preferred for material health claims.
Published and evidence-checked or recipe-reviewed dates are displayed so readers can judge recency.
Calories, nutrients, portions, formulas, and product examples are described as estimates when the inputs or method cannot establish an exact personal value.
Licensed or attributed photography links to its source when available. AI-generated editorial images are labeled as AI-generated rather than presented as documentary photography.
Writers should separate a measured finding from an inference, association, expert recommendation, product example, and personal choice. Stronger or more consequential claims require stronger evidence and clearer limits.
Recipe instructions should be complete enough to reproduce, use clear serving assumptions, and avoid unsupported dietary labels. Nutrition values are estimates built from available ingredient and serving data; missing source coverage should be omitted or called out rather than invented.
Product articles distinguish what exists, what is illustrative, what is in early access, and what is planned. They should not manufacture customer outcomes, clinical validation, availability, or performance claims.
AI-assisted visuals must be labeled at the image. Editorial responsibility stays with Moow: generation does not remove the need to check factual copy, image suitability, safety, rights, and the risk that a synthetic visual could be mistaken for evidence.
Send the story URL, the specific passage, and a supporting source to hello@moow.ai. Material corrections should update the story and its review or modification information rather than silently preserving a known error.
Every article should make its purpose, review date, and evidence trail easier to inspect.
Open The Daily